State v. Wright
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Appanoose District Court. — Hon. M. A. Roberts, Judge. . • The defendant was convicted of the crime of manslaughter. After final judgment, and after an appeal had been perfected therefrom, he made application to have the evidence in the case transcribed at the expense of the county, which was denied, and he appeals from that order.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.
1 2 :This is an appeal from an order refusing a transcript in this case at the expense of the county. The state contends that an appeal will not lie from the order. Section 251 of the Oode, under which the applieation was made, does not provide for an appeal; nor can it be successfully urged that an appeal will lie under section 5118, which provides for appeals in criminal cases, fori that section expressly states that an appeal can only be taken from the final judgment. This court has heretofore entertained appeals from orders ’under the statute in question, but without any suggestion as to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Blair v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Alline v. FranzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
3Cited by18 opinions
- Schmidt v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
- King v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- State v. GardnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.