Legal Opinion

King v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 15, 1919PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Johnson District Oowrt. — R. P. Ho well, Judge. Action for damages consequent on a collision with defendant’s train resulted in judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, C. J.

I. About August 2,1918, the plaintiff was engaged in cutting weeds on the defendant’s right of way in the vicinity of the Iowa City Canning Company’s Works. This was being done with a team and mower owned by him. The company, through its foreman, Wachs, had employed one Norval Letts, then 17 years of age, to keep a lookout for defendant’s trains. About 4:30 o’clock in the afternoon, while plaintiff was operating his mower, one of defendant’s passenger trains approached from the east, at a speed of from 36 to 40 miles an hour, and, as is alleged, negligently omitted to give any signal or…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Morbey v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Bourrett v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Schulte v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Estate of Townsend v. TownsendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Hawley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Menke v. PeterschmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  2. Ipsen v. RuessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. State v. IveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Eclipse Lumber Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. City Bank of Mitchellville v. AlcornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API