Legal Opinion

Groves v. Ruby

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1865PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

Suit by Ruby and Taryan, on a promissory note executed by the appellant, payable to Kramer and Ruby, upon which was this assignment: “For value received, I assign my half of the within note to John Taryan, April 1, 1860. [Signed,] Thomas Kramer.” Demurrer to the complaint for the following causes: 1. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor of plaintiffs. 2. The said Taryan is improperly joined as a co-plaintiff. The demurrer was overruled, and that presents the first question for consideration. It is urged that a part of a written contract cannot…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mewherter v. PriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Womack v. McahrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lapping v. DuffyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Train v. GridleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Goldman v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Singleton v. O'BlenisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. McFadden v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API