Legal Opinion
Sutton v. Roth, Wehrly, Heiny, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 10, 1981No. 3-1279 A 334PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Presiding Judge.
Maurice and Lorraine Sutton appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of Roth, Wehrly, Heiny, Inc., (Realty Corp.) in a breach of contract action. The issues as stated by the Suttons are:(1) whether plaintiff Corporation can recover, when it has failed to prove that it is a licensed real estate broker as required by statute;(2) whether there was sufficient evidence, or any evidence, to support a finding that the termination of the listing agreement was in bad faith, that there were “negotiations” while the listing agreement was in effect, and that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Singleton v. O'BlenisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Hidden Valley Lake, Inc. v. KerseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Thomas v. HennesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Clark Mutual Life Insurance v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Gerardot v. EmenhiserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Plan-Tec, Inc. v. WigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rogier v. American Testing & Engineering Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Trinity Lutheran Church, Inc. of Evansville v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- General Housewares Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.