Legal Opinion

Slauter v. Hollowell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 8327PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

— Slauter filed a complaint for a review of a judgment obtained against him by Hollowell in the Warren Circuit Court.

The complaint alleged error of law appearing in the proceedings. A demurrer to the complaint, for want of sufficient facts, was sustained; Slauter excepted and appealed..The only error assigned is that the court erred in sustaining said demurrer.

In the original action, the appellant filed a demurrer to the complaint, for want of sufficient facts, and said demurrer was overruled; the appellant then filed an answer in three paragraphs, to wit:

1st. The general…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Crawfordsville v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Knight v. LowIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Kegg v. WeldenIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R. W. Co. v. NicholsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. KenneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Singleton v. O'BlenisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. McCoy v. StockmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v. VelthouseIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API