Legal Opinion

Storwick v. Reliance Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1929No. 21224. Department OnePublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff Storwick commenced, in the superior court for King county, four actions against the defendant insurance company, in each of which he sought recovery upon an insurance policy issued to him by that company of benefit installments which he claims are due to him because of disability incurred, against which he is insured by each of the policies. The controlling facts and law being almost wholly common to all four actions, they were, by consent, consolidated for the purpose of trial. The actions so tried by the court, sitting with a jury, resulted in verdicts and judgments awarding…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hohn v. Inter-State Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kuhnle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Ladley v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kurth v. Continental Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Gibson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Ross v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API