Legal Opinion

Barger v. Hoover

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1889No. 13,785PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

This was an action by appellant against the appellees on a note and mortgage given by appellees Hoover and Hoover to the appellee Lesher, and by her endorsed to appellant. The appellee Amanda Lesher filed an answer, that when she endorsed the note and mortgage she was a 'married woman.

Hoover and Hoover answered, alleging that they were husband and wife, and owned the laud mortgaged by entire-ties, and that the debt sued for was the individual debt of the husband. They also filed an answer of want of consid*194eration. There was a trial by the court and a special finding of facts and conclusions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bristol Milling & Manufacturing Co. v. ProbascoIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Security Co. v. ArbuckleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Olvey v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Travellers Insurance v. ChappelowIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. E & L Rental Equipment, Inc. v. GiffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Metal Forming Technologies, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2004
  3. E & L Rental Equipment, Inc. v. GiffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API