Legal Opinion

Security Co. v. Arbuckle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1889No. 13,735PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J. —

This was a suit to foreclose a mortgage executed by Matthew and Mary E. Arbuckle, on the 6th day of May, 1882, to Thomas C. Day, and afterwards assigned by the latter to the Security Company, of Hartford, Connecticut. The mortgage was adjudged invalid upon the ground that the real estate mortgaged was owned by the mortgagors, Arbuckle and wife, as tenants by the entireties that the debt, to secure which the mortgage was given, was the debt of Matthew Arbuckle, the husband, and that Mary E. Arbuckle, wife of the former, received no part of the consideration for which the mortgage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vogel v. LeichnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Cupp v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ward v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schofield v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. McAfee v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Miller v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Wilson v. LogueIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Cummings v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API