Legal Opinion

Glenn v. Raymour

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2011No. Civil Action No. 10-CV-816PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Stephen Glenn (“Plaintiff’ or “Glenn”) has brought suit against his former employer, Raymour and Flanigan (“Defendant” or “Raymours”), for disparate treatment, retaliation, and hostile work environment under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; *542and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 Pa. Stat. § 951 et seq.1 Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, and 1367. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, I…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Scott v. Sunoco Logistics Partners, LPDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Caplan v. L Brands/Victoria's Secret Stores, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Bloch v. Mack Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Dececco v. UPMCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Glazer v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API