Legal Opinion
Dececco v. UPMC
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 7, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-272PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CONTI, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
Pending before the court is a motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 94) filed by plaintiff Diane DeCecco (“plaintiff’ or “DeCecco”) and a motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 97) filed by DeCecco’s former employer, defendants UPMC and UPMC Presbyterian Shady side (collectively “defendants” or “UPMC”).
Plaintiff initiated this action on March 2, 2012 by filing a complaint alleging UPMC discriminated against her in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (the “ADEA”). (ECF No. 1.) In the complaint,…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Quimbey ex rel. Faure v. Community Health Systems Professional Services Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Bendu Haynes v. Reading HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- FINN v. WEST PENN ALLEGHENY HEALTH SYSTEM INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- FRANKHOUSER v. THE HORST GROUP, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- WHITE v. ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.