Legal Opinion
Scott v. Sunoco Logistics Partners, LP
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 9, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-6284PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Adrienne Scott brings suit against Defendants Sunoco Logistics *347Partners, LP (“Sunoco”), Kimberly Legge, and Michelle Achenbach. Scott alleges that Sunoco subject her to disparate treatment and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 951 et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981.1 Additionally, Scott alleges that Defendants Legge and Achenbach (“Individual Defendants”) aided and abetted Sunoco’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ford-Greene v. NHS, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Deans v. Kennedy House, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Ramirez v. Palmer Twp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Antwan D. Morgan v. Pepsicola Metropolitan Bottling CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- CHERKASKY v. BOYERTOWN AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.