Legal Opinion

Burgess Battery Co. v. Marzall

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 20, 1951No. C. A. 3611-50PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNGDAHL, District Judge.

Plaintiff comes into Court for an adjudication authorizing the registration of a design consisting of vertical alternate light and dark stripes of indefinite size and extent, as a trade-mark for batteries on the principal register. On two prior occa sions plaintiff endeavored to have registered this design. The registration was first refused by the Court of Customs and Fatent Appeals in 1940. 1 Later in 1944 an attempt was made to register a shield surrounded by these same alternating light and dark stripes. This endeavor was likewise unsuccessful. 2

In refusing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. Life Savers Corporation v. Curtiss Candy CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  4. In Re Burgess Battery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  5. In re Burgess Battery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of True Temper CorpCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  2. Application of Esso Standard Oil CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Esso Standard Oil CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  4. Burgess Battery Company v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API