Legal Opinion

Fleischmann v. Starkey

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided May 14, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The complainants are the owners of certain trade-marks used upon their packages of compressed yeast, and they charge the defendant with an unlawful imitation of the same. It is clear, on a comparison 'of the labels, that the defendant is not guilty of any infringement unless the use of a yellow-colored label makes him chargeable. The position is taken by the complainants that the essential part of their trade-marks consists of a label having a yellow color, and that, therefore, they cover all yellow-colored labels used upon compressed yeast, and that the use by the defendant of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Falkinburg v. LucyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Faber v. FaberNew York Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. Saginaw Match Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  2. Church & Dwight Co. v. RussU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1900
  3. In Re Burgess Battery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  4. Pacific Coast Condensed Milk Co. v. Frye & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. In re Burgess Battery Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API