Hamus v. Weber

The appellants cláim the court should have granted a nonsuit or changed'the answers to the questions of the verdict respecting defendant’s negligence, but in our view the case was for the jury and the evidence supports their findings. Claim is also made that if the defendant was negligent the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, but we are of the opinion that the jury’s findings in this respect are also supported by the evidence.

Appellants also claim error in an instruction that if the rate of speed exceeded forty miles an hour it should be considered unlawful and negligent unless…