Legal Opinion

Inman v. Binghamton Housing Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1957PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

Six years after an apartment house had been completed and turned over to the owner, this action was brought against the architects who designed the structure and the builder who constructed it, as well as the owner, to recover for injuries suffered by a child of a tenant when he fell off a stoop or porch. We are here concerned with the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ complaint and defendant owner’s third-party complaint against the builder and architects.

William Inman, an infant, lived with his parents in an apartment leased by them from the Binghamton Housing Authority. When he was two years old…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Gillet v. . Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API