Legal Opinion

Mason v. City of Nashville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1927PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

By ordinance duly adopted the city of Nashville made provision for the widening of Church street, westward from the intersection of Church street and Eighth avenue.

The plaintiff in error, H. M. Mason, occupied the second story of a building located at the southwest corner of said street intersection, by lease from the owner. No tice was given to Mason,, by the proper officers of the city, that a portion of said building* had been condemned in order that the street might be widened, and that he would be required to deliver possession of his leased premises within ten days from the receipt of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pause v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Corrigan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Des Moines Wet Wash Laundry v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Bales v. Wichita Midland Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Union Railway Co. v. HuntonTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cole v. Goodwin & StoryNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Shelby County v. BardenTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Korf v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  4. Peggy L. Smith, Individually and as Trustee of Peggy L. Smith Trust v. Hi-Speed, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
  5. In Re Widening of Michigan Ave.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API