Legal Opinion

Aero Auto Parts, Inc. v. State Department of Transportation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1977No. 75-369PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The following issue is presented on appeal:

Is a tenant, under sec. 32.19(1), Stats. (1967), entitled to recover the cost of realigning personal property on the same site in a partial taking in eminent domain proceedings?

The plaintiff’s claim for compensation is based upon sec. 32.19(1), Stats. (1967), which was in effect at the time of the taking in this case. Sec. 32.19 of the statutes was repealed and recreated in chapter 409, Laws of 1969. In rewriting the section, the legislature chose to utilize a statutory framework significantly different from that of the repealed section. Therefore,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Omernik v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Student Ass'n of University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee v. BaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Neelen v. LucasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. City of West Allis v. DieringerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Standard Theatres, Inc. v. State, Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. LossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. WittrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API