Legal Opinion

Nicol v. Geitler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1933No. 29,074PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff appealed from an order denying her motion for a new trial after a verdict was directed for defendant.

Respondent George Geitler, the only defendant served and the father of Harold Geitler, lived in Minneapolis and owned an automobile. On April 18, 1928, 'with the express permission of his father, Harold Geitler, then about 18 years old, used the car. He invited his friend Harold E. Nash, 21 years of age, to ride with him to Osseo, a short distance north of Minneapolis, where they called at the home of Cora Baier at about eight o’clock p. m. In company Avith her…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Heffter v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Scovanner v. ToelkeOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Brown v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Livaudais v. BlackLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hepp v. Quickel Auto & Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Fellows v. FarmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Lopez v. TownsendNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Martin v. SloanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API