Legal Opinion

Scovanner v. Toelke

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1928No. 21050PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

The .sole question argued in this court is whether the municipal court erréd in overruling the motion of defendant for judgment in his favor at the close of plaintiff’s testimony. The issue is whether plaintiff sustained the burden imposed upon him to prove defendant’s negligence in the operation of the truck, as alleged in the petition.

The duty resting upon this court, on a review of the record, is to ascertain whether there is any evidence tending to prove defendant’s negligence in the operation of the truck. Negligence is never presumed, and the burden of proving it is always imposed upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glowacki v. North Western Ohio Ry. & Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Morrow, Recr. v. Hess, Aud.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Beeler v. PontingOhio Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Fink v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Jennings Buick, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Etheridge v. . EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Etheridge v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API