Legal Opinion
Tani v. FPL/Next Era Energy
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 15, 2011No. Civ. No. 10-860-LPSPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Kess Tani (“Plaintiff’), who proceeds pro se, filed this civil action raising numerous claims, including employment discrimination and supplemental State claims.1 (D.I. 1) Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs Requests for Default as to Defendants Florida Power and Light (FPL), a/k/a NextEraEnergy, and Myriad Technical Service Corp. (“Myriad Corp.”), opposed by Myriad Corp. and Mirih Dash (“Dash”)2 (together “Myriad”) as well as by Florida Power and Light, and Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Florida…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Raquet v. Allstate Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Greenstar, LLC v. HellerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Issa v. Delaware State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- Alsco, Inc. v. Premier Outsourcing Plus, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Brent Lamar Jones v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, Jim Taiclet, and Frank St. JohnDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.