Legal Opinion

Brent Lamar Jones v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, Jim Taiclet, and Frank St. John

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 14, 2026No. 1:26-cv-00388Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BRENT LAMAR JONES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 26-388-GBW LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, JIM TAICLET, and FRANK ST. JOHN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendants’! Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 15), which has been fully briefed (D.I. 16; D.I. 23; D.I. 24). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 15) is granted and Plaintiff's Complaint (D.I. 1) is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's recent motions seeking entry of default, default judgment, a writ of execution, and other…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Mayer v. BelichickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API