Legal Opinion

Mann v. St Clair County Road Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2003No. Docket 226443PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

Defendant St. Clair County Road Commission appeals by leave granted the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion in limine to preclude application of the five percent damage reduction cap authorized by MCL 257.710e(6)1 in circumstances where the injured parties were allegedly not *88wearing safety belts at the time of the accident. We affirm.

Under the controlling language of Klinke v Mitsubishi Motors Corp, 458 Mich 582; 581 NW2d 272 (1998), and principles governing analysis of issues under the Title-Object Clause, Const 1963, art 4, § 24, any comparative negligence of plaintiffs, if…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mann v. St Clair County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. FischkeltaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Mann v. St Clair County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Mann v. St Clair County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API