Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mann v. St Clair County Road Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2004No. Docket 122845Published

1DissentKelly, J.

I would find that the five percent cap on damage reduction for failure to wear one’s safety belt applies to a suit brought under the highway exception to governmental immunity. This would be consistent with my dissenting opinion in Klinke v Mitsubishi Motors Corp, 458 Mich 582; 581 NW2d 272 (1998).

STATUTORY ANALYSIS

The safety belt statute provides:

Failure to wear a safety belt in violation of this section may be considered evidence of negligence and may reduce the recovery for damages arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or operation of a motor vehicle. However, such negligence shall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klinke v. Mitsubishi Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ullery v. SobieMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Thompson v. FitzpatrickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Mann v. St Clair County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API