Legal Opinion

Mann v. St Clair County Road Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2004No. Docket 122845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The sole issue before the Court is whether the safety belt use statute’s cap on the reduction of damages, MCL 257.710e(6), applies when suit is brought against a county road commission under the highway exception to governmental immunity. MCL 257.710e(6) provides that a plaintiffs damages arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or operation of a motor vehicle can be reduced by no more than five percent because of a plaintiffs failure to wear a safety belt. We adopt Justice BOYLE’s concurrence in Klinke v Mitsubishi Motors Corp, 458 Mich 582; 581 NW2d 272 (1998), and hold that MCL…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lowe v. Estate Motors Ltd.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Romankewiz v. BlackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Fillmore Twp v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Township of Casco v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Township of Casco v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API