Legal Opinion

Mapel v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1924No. 14552PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Tillman county in a case in which the defendant in error Long-Bell Lumber Company was plaintiff, and O. E. Mapel, and others, alleged to be doing business as Oil City Laundry, were defendants, and the Service Lumber Company, Grandfield Lumber & Supply Company, and Harris-Deaver Lumber Company, were interveners.

The cause involved the claims of the plaintiff Long-Bell Lumber Company and the interveners for the amounts stated in their lien statements for furnishing lumber and material for the construction of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Westcott v. GilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Heaton v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Hunter v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Lynch v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Braden Co. v. Lancaster Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Johnson v. Plastex CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Central Finance Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Continental Oil Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API