Legal Opinion

A. E. McDonald Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided April 17, 1940No. 182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, a motor carrier operator, brought this suit to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, finally denying him a “grandfather” certificate1 on the ground that operating without permit or certificate from the Railroad Commission of Texas, and in a continual state of conflict with it, he was not, within the Federal Motor Carrier Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq., in bona fide operation.

Complainant, pointing out that his dperations have always been in interstate, never in intrastate, commerce, insists (1) that the Railroad Commission of Texas has…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Bradley v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCanless v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gulf Coast Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1940
  3. Braswell Motor Freight Lines v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API