Gulf Coast Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff applied to the commission under the two provisos of Section 306(a), 49 U. S.C.A., the first, or “grandfather” proviso; the second or certificate clause. At the hearing it made no serious effort to make proof under the first proviso, but rested its rights upon the second proviso and a permit or certificate, it had obtained from the Texas State Commission, not of public convenience and necessity, but that its operation in interstate commerce between named points in the state of Texas would not injuriously interfere with or affect the highways or the safety of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- George W. Bush & Sons Co. v. MaloySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Railroad Commission v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Winton v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Texport Carrier Corp. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Medigen of Kentucky, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of West VirginiaDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1991
- Hart v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1964
- Oswego Transportation Lines, Inc. v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Central Maryland Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
- Daniels v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.