Legal Opinion

Bonanno v. Quizno's Franchise Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided January 20, 2009No. Civil Action No. 06-cv-02358-CMA-KLMPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*552ORDER

KRISTEN L. MIX, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony of Defendant Richard E. Schaden [Docket No. 206; Filed September 26, 2008] (the “Motion”). The Court has reviewed the Motion, Defendants’ Response [Docket No. 246; Filed October 16, 2008], Plaintiffs’ Reply [Docket No. 248; Filed October 31, 2008], the entire case file and applicable case law and is sufficiently advised in the premises. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED, as set forth below.

I. Background

This is a putative class…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. Cedar Street Venture, LLC v. JuddSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. Tara Woods Ltd. Partnership v. Fannie MaeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
  4. Eaglebank v. Yajia Hu Schwartz Revocable Trust Dated 12/12017District Court, D. Colorado · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API