Legal Opinion

In Re District Court

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 27, 2011No. 10SA374PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

256 P.3d 687 (2011)

In re DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, 09CV7235.

Cedar Street Venture, LLC a Colorado limited liability company and Montage Project Joint Venture, Plaintiffs,

v.

Richard D. Judd and Robinson Waters & O'Dorisio, P.C. and District Court, City and County of Denver, 09CV11018, Defendants.

Moreland/Manoogian, LLC and Tamsen Investments, LLC, Plaintiffs,

v.

Richard D. Judd, Stephen L. Waters, and Robinson Waters & O'Dorisio, P.C., Defendants.

No. 10SA374.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

June 27, 2011.

The Law Offices of Peter R. Bornstein, Peter R. Bornstein, Denver,…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Martinelli v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR CITY, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. Leidholt v. District Court in and for City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Williams v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. Alcon v. SpicerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of WigginsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  2. Gateway Logistics, Inc. v. SmaySupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  3. Carlson v. JerousekAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  4. Real Estate Commission v. VizziColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. In Re Jina Garcia, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Centura Health CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API