Legal Opinion
Rudebusch v. Hughes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 9, 2002No. 01-15287PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge McKEOWN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
We address here a challenge to the onetime base pay adjustments given to certain women and minority faculty by Northern Arizona University in an effort to achieve pay equity mandated by federal regulations. The appeal presents claims under both the Equal Protection Clause as against the university president and under Title VII as against the University. We affirm the finding of qualified immunity for the university president. We analyze the Title VII claim in accordance with the Supreme…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- George Mitchell v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Lynne Meredith Gayle Bybee Jenifer Meredith Bernadette Keller Carla Figaro, the People of California, Ex Rel. v. Andrew ErathCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.