Legal Opinion
Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 2007No. 04-16688, 04-16720PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PREGERSON1 Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD.
ORDER AND OPINION
ORDER
The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
The panel’s Opinion and Dissent filed February 6, 2007, appearing at 474 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir.2007), are withdrawn. The new Opinion and Dissent are filed concurrently with this Order.
The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot. The parties may file a new petition for rehearing or suggestion for rehearing en banc as provided for by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40.
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs filed a class action suit against Wal-Mart alleging…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Luanna Scott v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Alberto v. GMRI, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Californians for Disability Rights, Inc. v. California Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.