Legal Opinion

State v. Daniels

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1979No. 793SC521PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

When we consider the record on appeal — the indictment, the verdict and the judgment — we find fatal error. The defendant was charged in the bill of indictment with larceny by an employee, G.S. § 14-74. The jury found him guilty of “larceny,” and the judgment recites that he was convicted of “misdemeanor larceny.”

It is hornbook law that “an indictment will not support a conviction for a crime all the elements of which crime are not accurately and clearly alleged in the indictment.” State v. Perry, 291 N.C. 586, 592, 231 S.E. 2d 262, 266 (1977), and cases cited therein. The bill…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. State v. BabbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. . HigginsSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1792

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. BurgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API