Legal Opinion

State v. Burge

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 2011No. COA10-493Published

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant William Burge, Jr. appeals from a judgment sentencing him for commission of a Class 1 misdemeanor based on the jury’s finding him guilty of failing to confine a dangerous dog. Because defendant was charged only with violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 67-4.2 (2009), a Class 3 misdemeanor, we must vacate and remand for resentencing.

Facts

The State’s evidence tended to show the following facts. In 2007, defendant’s two dogs were formally designated as dangerous dogs under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 67-4.1 (2007) by the appropriate county board. As a result of this designation, defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. . HigginsSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1792
  4. State v. BarneycastleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API