Legal Opinion

State v. Babb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1977No. 7711SC416PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Did the trial court err in denying defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit on the ground that there was no evidence that the tires and tubes were stolen property?

The indictment charges that defendant did feloniously receive property knowing the same to have been “feloniously stolen, taken, and carried away, . . .” The quoted words are a short-hand definition of common-law larceny. But the evidence fails to establish common-law larceny of the tires and tubes. One element of common-law larceny is that the property must be taken under such circumstances as to amount…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. State v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. State v. . DelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. Boylan-Pearce, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. KeyesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. LovickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API