Legal Opinion
Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & Russell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 15, 2007No. A06A2135, A06A2136PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MlKELL, Judge.
This is a continuation of legal malpractice litigation brought by appellants/cross-appellees Douglas Paul, Sharon Paul, Catspaw, Inc. (“Catspaw”), Catspaw Productions, Inc. (“CPI”), Atlanta Cateo, Inc. (“Cateo”), and Recording Studio, Inc. (“RSI”) (collectively, the “appellants”), against Smith, Gambrell & Russell n/k/a Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP (the “law firm”). The law firm represented appellants before and during commercial litigation brought by their former business partner, Ralph Destito, which culminated in a 1999 verdict and judgment against them for $489,727 in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Berman v. RubinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Paul v. DestitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Kushner v. McLartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abdulla v. KlosinskiDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012
- Guerrero v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- G. Douglas Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & Russell N/K/A Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLPCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Rice v. PoppeNebraska Supreme Court · 2016