Legal Opinion

G. Douglas Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & Russell N/K/A Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 2013No. A13A0227Published

1Opinion of the Court

SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., MILLER and RAY, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ July 16, 2013 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A13A0227. PAUL et al. v. SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL n/k/a SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP. MILLER, Judge. This is the third appeal arising out of a legal malpractice action that Appellants G. Douglas Paul, Sharon V. Paul, Catspaw Productions, Inc., Catspaw, Inc., Atlanta Catco, Inc., and Recording Studio, Inc.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Zepp v. BrannenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Paul v. DestitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Jefferson v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Goodwyn v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Lott v. Arrington & Hollowell, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API