Legal Opinion

Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & Russell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 2013No. A13A0227Published

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

This is the third appeal arising out of a legal malpractice action that Appellants G. Douglas Paul, Sharon V. Paul, Catspaw Productions, Inc. (“CPI”), Catspaw, Inc., Atlanta Catco, Inc., and Recording Studio, Inc. (“RSI”) commenced against Smith, Gambrell & Russell (“Smith Gambrell”) in 2002. See Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & Russell, 267 Ga. App. 107 (599 SE2d 206) (2004) (“Paul I”); Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & Russell, 283 Ga. App. 584 (642 SE2d 217) (2007) (“Paul II”). In Paul II, the parties filed cross-appeals from the trial court’s April 11, 2005 order granting in part and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Zepp v. BrannenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Paul v. DestitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Jefferson v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Goodwyn v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Lott v. Arrington & Hollowell, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API