Legal Opinion

E. S. Shelby Vinegar Co. v. Hawn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 9, 1908PublishedCited by 11 opinions

ActioN tried before Ferguson, /./and a jury, February ■Term, 1908. Plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, 0. J.

This is an action on an account for sale of cider. It is found by the jury that the plaintiff’s predecessor, or assignor, contracted in Hickory, N. O., for the sale of cider to be delivered in that town, that the cider sold was intoxicating, and that plaintiff’s predecessor knew that tire sale of intoxicating liquor was prohibited in Hickory by the laws of the State at the time of such contract of sale, and of the delivery. The Court, upon these findings .entered judgment against plaintiff for costs, on the ground that- “the plaintiff cannot maintain an action for goods, the sale…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. State v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. King v. . WinantsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Kelly v. CourterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1892
  5. State v. Johnston.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Price v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Crescent Liquor Co. v. Johnson, Vaughan & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Finance Co. v. . HendrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Phosphate Co. v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Security Finance Co. v. HendrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API