Legal Opinion
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Landry
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 20, 1989No. CA 87 1459PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARDS, Judge.
From an adverse ruling in the trial court, Landry claimants have appealed. Because we find clear error in assigning the burden of proof and the resolution on the facts presented, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with the reasons stated herein.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., filed a concursus proceeding under LSA-C.C.P. art. 3654 to determine the proper parties entitled to mineral royalties from a disputed tract of land. Named as one set of defendants/claimants were Eric Chustz, Norris Broussard and Eloise Chustz Broussard, Roy Francis Chustz,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hill v. RicheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Liner v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- Pure Oil Company v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Norton v. AddieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Canal, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chevron USA Inc. v. LandrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Mt. Everett African Methodist Episcopal Church v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Chevron USA Inc. v. BergeronLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Gros v. Biosvert Farms LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. LandrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989