Legal Opinion
Harrison v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided November 1, 2006No. PD-1193-04Published
1Opinion of the Court
205 S.W.3d 549 (2006)
Mary Elizabeth HARRISON, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas.
No. PD-1193-04.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
November 1, 2006.
Robert Ford, Fort Worth, for appellant.
Anne Swenson, David M. Curl, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty's, Fort Worth, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.
OPINION
KEASLER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which KELLER, P.J., WOMACK, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
Holding that the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Mary Elizabeth Harrison voluntarily consented to provide a urine specimen, the court of appeals reversed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.