Legal Opinion
Treider v. Doherty and Company
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 27, 1974No. 1351PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Plaintiff Treider undertook to invest part of an inheritance in speculative, over-the-counter stocks. She selected Doherty and Company as a broker, who acted through the defendant Keyes. Keyes failed to mention to Ms. Treider certain facts about some of the stocks he sold to her. She sued under § 48-18-29(A), N. M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 1966) which states in pertinent part:
“ . . . It is a fraudulent practice and unlawful for any person, in connection with an offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly, to:
“make any false statement of material fact or to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Cady v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Hockett v. WinksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kittilson v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Naranjo v. PaullNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Conley Lott Nichols MacHinery Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Trivectra v. UshijimaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. RossNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.