Legal Opinion
Second Ecclesiastical Society of Hartford v. Attorney General
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 12, 1946PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The present trustees under the will of William Stanley are limited in the investment of trust funds to “good and sufficient Bonds and Mortgages of Real Estate of double the value of the amount invested.” They have brought this suit in equity asking that the Superior Court empower them to invest their funds in such securities and mortgages as are permitted by the provisions of the General Statutes relating to the investment of trust funds. The beneficiary of the trust estate is a coplaintiff. The attorney general was made defendant by virtue of the provisions of § 149 of the General Statutes,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Norwalk Street Railway Company's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Bridgeport Public Library & Reading Room v. Burroughs HomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Newton v. Healy, Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lockwood v. KillianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- City of Hartford v. Larrabee Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Britton v. KillianConnecticut Superior Court · 1968
- MacCurdy-salisbury Educational Fund v. KillianConnecticut Superior Court · 1973
- Friedman v. TeplisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.