Legal Opinion
City of Hartford v. Larrabee Fund Ass'n
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 21, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.
On May 4, 1863, Major Charles Larrabee died, leaving a will with three duly executed codicils.1 Hereinafter we will refer to “the will” as encompassing the will and the three probated codicils. The will was admitted to probate in the Probate Court for the district of Hartford. The will bequeathed the major portion of Larrabee’s estate to the city of Hartford, and a smaller amount to the town of West Hartford, both in trust, to create a fund for specified purposes, to be distributed in a specified manner. The fund was accepted by the city of Hartford, as trustee, in accordance with the terms…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- STATE BAR ASSN. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Heiberger v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Shannon v. EnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Bridgeport Public Library & Reading Room v. Burroughs HomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- City of Tacoma v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Yale University v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.