Legal Opinion
Lockwood v. Killian
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 4, 1979PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The plaintiffs are members of a special selection committee of the Puller Scholarship Fund. In 1974, they instituted an action for instructions from the Superior Court, claiming to be unable to perform their duties in the administration of the trust fund without advice from the court. Acting upon a stipulation of facts, the court removed some, but not all,1 of the restrictions on *64the beneficiaries of the fund. In Lockwood v. Killian, 172 Conn. 496, 375 A.2d 998 (1977) (hereinafter Lockwood I), this court remanded the case for a new trial because the judgment of the trial court was “predicated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shannon v. EnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Lockwood v. KillianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Nowell v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Newton v. Healy, Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Ministers & Missionaries Benefit Board v. Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Canaan National Bank v. PetersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Baker v. EnisWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. Maier, No. 112839 (Jan. 24, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Blumenthal v. Barnes, No. Pjr Cv-99-0430843s (Apr. 27, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Cornwall v. Cornwall Library Assn., No. Cv 99 0081053 S (Feb. 23, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.