Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Teplis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 24, 1997No. S97A1204PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

At issue in this case is a court’s equitable power to modify a trust. Appellants are trustees of a trust and appellees are the settlors and beneficiaries of the trust. All parties sought a modification of the trust under OCGA § 53-12-153 based on an unanticipated change of circumstances. The trial court denied the modification. Because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that appellants had not shown clear and convincing evidence to warrant modification, we affirm.

The evidence presented to the trial court by affidavit and testimony showed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wachovia Bank and Trust Company v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Leonardini v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Second Ecclesiastical Society of Hartford v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  5. Donnelly v. National Bank of Wash.Washington Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. HallumSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. Smith v. HallumSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Smith v. HallumSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API