Legal Opinion
Garfield v. Director of the Division of Employment Security
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 12, 1979PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.
The appellant Michael Garfield was discharged from his job as manager of a retail health food store on November 15, 1976. He applied for unemployment compensation. After a hearing held on January 12, 1977, the director of the Division of Employment Security denied Garfield benefits on the ground that his discharge came within the meaning of G. L. c. 151A, § 25 (e) (2), as amended through St. 1975, c. 684, § 78.1 Garfield appealed *95to the division’s board of review. The board, through a single review examiner (G. L. c. 151A, § 41), took evidence, made findings of fact, and affirmed the decision…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Raytheon Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Goodridge v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Keough v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Maywood Glass Co. v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Hinson v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Lycurgus v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Still v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Commissioner of Department of Employment & Training v. DuganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.