Legal Opinion

State v. Dunbar

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 22, 1998No. AC 17143PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPEAR, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of carrying a pistol without a permit in violation of General Statutes § 29-35 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the state’s evidence, (2) allowed the state to reopen its case-in-chief to present additional *315evidence and (3) denied his request to redact a prejudicial statement from a defense exhibit. Although the first claim attacks the sufficiency of the evidence, the waiver rule precludes review.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. State v. DeMatteoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. State v. ErhardtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. State v. DunbarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. State v. MeikleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API