State v. Kari
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of unlawful removal or alteration of records in violation of General Statutes § 53-153.1 The same jury acquitted the defendant of two counts of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence in violation of General Statutes § 53a-155. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly admitted his incriminating statement into evidence and improperly denied his motions for judgment of acquittal. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. In 1986, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. RuthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. RutanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. TillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. WolffConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. BookerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. BattistaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- State v. DunbarConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.