Flores v. Autozone West, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEDSWORTH, J.
This appeal stems from a summary judgment entered in favor of AutoZone West, Inc. AutoZone successfully asserted below that it could not be held liable for the damages caused by its employee’s physical assault of a customer at an AutoZone store after the customer had spoken to him in an arguably insulting manner. According to AutoZone, the employee’s conduct was outside the scope of his employment as a matter of law, because it “was not ‘fairly attributable to work-related events or conditions.’ ” We disagree. In our view, the evidence in this case supports the reasonable…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Xue Lu v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Holmes v. Campbell Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010
- Montague v. Amn Healthcare, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Xue Lu v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Montague v. AMN HealthcareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014