Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. City of Seymour

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1900No. 18,629PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Erom the Jennings Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBakes, J.

Appellant’s complaint alleges in substance that appellant is the owner of a parcel of ground forty feet wide on each side of the center of its main track through the city of Seymour, and that it and its predecessor, the Ohio and Mississippi Railway Company, have been in the continuous possession thereof for railroad purposes since 1852; that in May, 1897, the city, under an ordinance, contracted with its co-appellee, the Capitol Paving and Construction Company, to pave a portion of the right of way, about 700 feet in length and of the full width of eighty feet except the ground covered by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shellhouse v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Town of Crown PointIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Miller v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. City of Noblesville v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. O'ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Cannon v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Stewart v. SwartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Cincinnati, Richmond & Fort Wayne Railroad v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Strunk v. PritchettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API